Showing posts with label tech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tech. Show all posts

This Mirror Automatically TakesSelfies For You


Just when we think the world is crazy enough, someone goes and makes this. Ladies and gentlemen,
I present to you the S.E.L.F.I.E., aka “The Self Enhancing Live Feed Image Engine,” a two-way mirror
that takes photos and uploads them to Twitter.
The creators of this mirror are iStrategyLabs, a digital agency. The product is basically a two-way mirror equipped with a Mac mini, a web cam and LED lights.
Once you stand in front of the mirror, the facial recognition software recognizes you and takes the photo. You’re then notified by the LED lights once the photo is taken and it’s promptly shared on
Twitter.
Crazy Right!!
Business Unplugged H/t Nextshark
Read More

Paedophiles Could Soon Be Given Realistic Child Sex-robots As Part of Their Treatment

Robotics experts said the 'sexbots' that resemble children were inevitable

Claims child sex bots will significantly reduce the number of people overall who abuse children

Paedophiles could be given realistic child sexbots as part of their treatment, it has been
claimed.

Robot prostitute

The first phase would be introduction of Robot Prostitutes.
Researchers argue robot sex workers would eliminate human exploitation, ensure a disease-free experience (as long as the robots were hosed down after), and could be enjoyed in places where prostitution is illegal.

It may sound weird, but think about the intimate relationship you have with your iPhone. You’ve taken it to bed multiple times already; imagine if Siri could actually massage you.

” Once we start creating sex-robots, what will be the limits we put on them?
It’s not a human being so you should theoretically be able to rock your human-like Rumba however you want.

Child sex-robots

Accordong to reports Forbes:

Arkin,a robotics researcher said that while he doesn’t approve of child sex bots for recreational use, he’d like to see them used for research purposes. “Child-like robots could be used for pedophiles the way methadone is used to treat drug addicts,” said Arkin.

He said research should be done to test the effectiveness of such a treatment. “There are no presumptions that this will assuredly yield positive results – I only believe it is worth investigating in a controlled way to possibly provide better. protection to society from recidivism in sex offenders,” he said.

“If we can save some children, I
think it’s a worthwhile project.”
He added that he did worry about the possible creation of a black market that would offer the robots outside of a clinical setting. This isn’t the first time Arkin has broached the indelicate subject.

If an entrepreneur started up KidSexBots-R-Us, would it be legal?
Ryan Calo, a law professor at the University of Washington, thinks it might be, based on the Supreme Court’s treatment of child pornography.

“What appears to be child porn, but isn’t, is not illegal,” said Calo. Making or possessing child pornography results in severe legal penalties; those who watch child porn sometimes get longer sentences than people convicted of actually molesting children.

However, in 2002, the Supreme Court drew a line between child porn and “virtual child
porn” where the “child” is actually a young-looking adult or a computer-rendered image. It said
images that are wholly faked, no matter how realistic they were, are legal. So the law might see
sex with a “virtual child” the same way.

At least in the U.S.
If you’re a Canadian,it could get you in trouble. Last year, a 48-
year-old Canadian man ordered a 4-foot, 2-inch school-uniform-wearing sex doll made of “foam-
like material.” For some reason, it was intercepted and unboxed by Canada Border Services agents
at Toronto airport. They arrested the doll fan and charged him with child pornography.

According to local media, child sex dolls are illegal in Canada.

I’m sure that many people would be horrified at the idea of that robot being molested and do their best to shut down such a company even if the law embraces it. “It’s a
decision for society to make,” said robot expert Noel Sharkey, adding that people could circumvent the question by saying their sex robots were just “short adult robots.”

© Business Unplugged

Read More

The Pentagon Has Successfully Tested Self-Guided Bullets


The Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has announced the first successful live-fire tests of the military’s first smart, self-guided bullets.
In a video released by DARPA Thursday, Extreme Accuracy Tasked Ordinance (EXACTO) .50-caliber bullets maneuvered independently mid-flight to accurately strike targets purposefully offset from where the firing sniper rifle was aimed

Wired reported in 2012 the first successful prototype test of the military’s first-ever guided small-caliber bullets, developed by Sandia National Laboratories and Lockheed Martin. Around four inches long, the bullets feature optical tips to detect laser beams shown on targets. Actuators inside the bullets then steer tiny fins on their surfaces, which guide them to targets based on information from the tip sensors.

The bullets can strike a target accurately while accommodating for weather, wind, target movement and other factors, according to DARPA. The prototype tests were able to successfully strike targets from more-than a mile, or 6,500 feet away.
“For military snipers, acquiring moving targets in unfavorable conditions, such as high winds and dusty terrain commonly found in Afghanistan, is extremely challenging with current technology,” the agency explains on its website. “It is critical that snipers be able to engage targets faster, and with better accuracy, since any shot that doesn’t hit a target also risks the safety of troops by indicating their presence and potentially exposing their location.”

“The EXACTO .50-caliber round and optical sighting technology expects to greatly extend the day and nighttime range over current state-of-the-art sniper systems.”

 Business Unplugged
Read More
, , , ,

2013 tech flops: Biggest busts so far

In technology, companies are unveiling new products almost every day, touting each as if it were the one device that will truly change the world.

Rarely is that true, and for every big hit there are many misses. For whatever reason -- perhaps a steep price, lack of interest or just uselessness -- some products never catch on and turn out to be big flops. And halfway through 2013, there have already been quite a few of these cases.

1.Google Chromebook Pixel

The Chromebook Pixel is a great little computer. It has a crystal-clear screen, beautiful design, and numerous useful features, but at the steep price of $1,300, this Google laptop has failed to generate sales the way other Chromebook computers have.

2.BlackBerry Z10

BlackBerry, formerly known as Research In Motion, was hoping to push back into the U.S. smartphone market this year with the BlackBerry Z10 as its crown jewel. But so far neither the Z10 or any of its other new devices have gained ground on Apple and Android. And now, BlackBerry has announced that it is considered selling itself.

3.HTC First (the Facebook phone)

After years of rumors of a Facebook phone, Mark Zuckerberg and crew finally delivered with the HTC First. The device ran Facebook Home, a version of Android tailored to keep you within Facebook's social network at all times. Facebook thought this would be a popular concept, but it soon learned some users did not want so much Facebook all throughout their smartphones. As a result, AT&T struggled to sell the device and quickly lowered its price from $99 to 99 cents.

4.Twitter Music

Twitter scored a major hit this year when it released Vine, but its other app release, Twitter Music, has failed to catch on completely. The service is supposed to help users discover new music, but unlike Vine which now has more than 40 million users, Twitter Music never built up any momentum.

5.Microsoft Surface RT

The Surface RT was released in late 2012 as Microsoft's response to Apple's iPad. But, despite the company's commercials that show the Surface RT outperforming the iPad thanks to some unique features, the Surface RT has had poor sales. Ultimately Microsoft had to take a $1-billion charge against its earnings because of unsold devices, and earlier this summer the company began slashing the Surface RT's price.

6.Nintendo Wii U

Similar to the Surface RT, the Nintendo Wii U has also struggled to sell. Though it is the successor to the ultra-popular Wii game system, the Wii U has sold so poorly that in July Nintendo reported a $50-million loss in net sales.

7.YouTube on Windows Phone

Twice this year Microsoft has tried to release a working version of a YouTube app for its smartphones, but twice YouTube has had issues with the product and forced Microsoft to remove the app from its app store. Bickering between the two companies has left Windows Phone users without a way to watch YouTube natively through their smartphones.

Read More
, , , ,

The Biggest Flops in Tech This Year

also related: 2013 biggest tech busts

Another year in the books! (Almost). As such, we're taking a look back at the biggest flops in consumer technology for the year.

It's interesting to see which companies are getting better at reining in poor products, and which aren't. This year, Google had practically no flops. And Apple had just a few minor errors. Compared to years past, this is really good.

Google in particular seems like a much more disciplined, more focused company today than ever before. Then again, in sports there's a saying that goes, "If you ain't cheating, you ain't trying." The tech equivalent would be, "If you ain't failing, you ain't trying." A few flops here and there are good—it means you're trying something new. Not everything is going to work, and you can't be scared to test out new ideas.

15. Microsoft's CEO succession planning

We're not quite sure how to frame this one, but there was something weird about Steve Ballmer's retirement. He says he's leaving of his own accord, yet he put plans in place for a radical reorg of the company just a few weeks before he announced his retirement. And, Microsoft didn't have his replacement lined up, so it's been out there trying to figure out who is going to run the company next. This process has been odd, and stilted.

14. The Google Barge

Google was working on a mysterious barge in the San Francisco Bay. Initial speculation said it was going to be a floating data center. Later reports said it would be a storefront for Google Glass . Now, it looks like it might not be anything because Google failed to get the proper permits for the barge. The multi-million dollar project is now under investigation .

13. The iPhone 5C

Sales of the iPhone 5C appear to be weaker than expected. There have been multiple reports of Apple cutting 5C production in favor of the iPhone 5S. For Apple's business, this is a good thing. But, it's perplexing. We're not sure why Apple did the 5C. Maybe it becomes clearer in the future.

12. The television industry's attack on Aereo

Aereo is a new way to watch TV. It transmits broadcast channels to your tablet and phone. Big TV companies are not happy about it, so they've been trying to sue the company into oblivion. Thus far, their lawsuits have done nothing but bring attention to the company .

11. Apple's twee advertisements

Apple released very serious advertisements this year about why it does what it does. The ads were a hit with Apple employees and Apple bloggers. But for normal people, they were off- putting and cold. The ads didn't last very long.

10. Yahoo's new logo

Marissa Mayer was personally involved in the design of Yahoo's new logo. Maybe she should have stayed away.

9. Payments startup Clinkle

How does a company that has yet to launch a product land on a list of flops? By raising a massive seed round of financing, releasing a pretentious, vague promotional video , and then laying off a huge chunk of its staff. If you're an investor in Clinkle, you have to be nervous.

8. Yahoo Mail redesign

Users really don't like Yahoo's Gmail-esque redesign . Yahoo stripped away features users liked. The redesign was bad, but what's even worse is that Mail has had problems staying up, and Yahoo's response has been bad.

7. HTC One

The HTC One is a great phone. It might be the best Android phone on the market. And yet, no one is buying it. HTC, which was at one time the biggest Android phone company, is in a tailspin. The One was supposed to save it. It failed.

6. The Surface RT

Microsoft took a $900 million charge on the Surface. Not sure we need to say much more.

5. BlackBerry 10

BlackBerry 10 finally launched this year. It was a total failure. No one wanted it. As a result, the company spent the year trying to sell itself, then changing its mind about selling itself. The CEO is gone, and the company is now considered an ancient relic.

4. The Moto X

Motorola's Moto X is a good phone, but it's been a flop in the market. It's barely selling despite a massive marketing push from Google/ Motorola. We're not sure what Motorola can do about this other than keep trying to improve its product, and hope that eventually consumers come around.

3. Facebook's Poke App

Snapchat has made a mockery of Facebook this year. At the end of 2012, Facebook tried to crush Snapchat with Poke, which was a clone of Snapchat. No one used it. So, if you can't beat 'em, buy 'em, right? Snapchat rejected a $1 billion offer from Facebook. Then it reportedly rejected a $3 billion buyout offer. Not a good look for the mighty Facebook.

2. Samsung's Galaxy Gear Woof.

That's all we can say about Samsung's Galaxy Gear, a smart watch that was supposed to work with its smartphones. The Gear was a big flop, and Samsung is already working on a second version. A Samsung executive speaking at our conference likened the Gear to a not-yet ripened tomato. Kind of a bummer for anyone that paid $300 for the Gear.

1. Facebook Home

Facebook Home was supposed to be Facebook's big attempt to take over Android. It was a downloadable skin for Android that turned an Android phone into a Facebook phone. When it launched, people thought it might be so successful that Google would block it. Google didn't have anything to worry about. Home was a total bust, and no one used it. We heard Facebook is back to the drawing board, and hopes to have a better version of the product out next year.

Read More
, , ,

man buys back a company he sold for $850 million to AOL at just $1 million five years latter

The internet entrepreneur who founded Bebo has paid $1m (£660,000) to buy back the social networking site five years after selling it to AOL for $850m. Michael Birch, who co-founded the site with his wife, Xochi, in 2005, tweeted late on Monday: "We just bought back Bebo for $1m. Can we actually re-invent it? Who knows, but will be fun trying …" Once the darling of younger teenagers in Britain, Bebo reached a peak of 40 million monthly users in 2008 when it was bought by AOL in a deal widely regarded even at the time as significantly overpriced. By 2010 a lack of strategic leadership on the part of AOL and the rapid growth of Facebook had crippled Bebo, and AOL in effect closed it down, though users could still access the site. The investment consortium Criterion Capital Partners bought Bebo's assets for between $2.5m and $10m in June 2010, later bringing Birch on board as strategic adviser. Birch is now the sole owner after beating two rival bids in a post-bankruptcy auction. A team of designers and engineers at Birch's San Francisco-based business Monkey Inferno are now working on redesigning the site. Shaan Puri, chief executive of Monkey Inferno, said: "We're excited about the ambitious challenge of bringing Bebo back, and couldn't be happier to announce that the product will be back in the hands of the founders. We know the odds are stacked against us but we love challenges and the Bebo users deserve better that what they have received in the past few years." Puri added: "The $1m purchase covered all of the assets of Bebo Inc (hardware, software, intellectual property etc). In simple terms, we now own the website clear of any other shareholders. "Needless to say, we are ecstatic to have the site back in the hands of the founders! It will be a huge challenge to reinvent Bebo, but we're up for the challenge." Birch faces a significant battle to differentiate Bebo from Facebook, which allows users to join from the age of 13. Bebo's core user base was younger teenagers, a notoriously fickle market as the rival MySpace also discovered. While MySpace has attempted a slick redesign and refocus on music, teens have also shifted towards apps including Snapchat, which lets users share pictures that self- destruct, and sharing tools such as Vine and Instagram. Bebo is re-entering a very competitive and fast-moving market with only a fraction of its peak userbase. The site had 420,000 unique visitors in the UK in May this year, down from 626,000 in May 2012, according to comScore. The Birches owned 70% of Bebo when it was sold to AOL and were estimated to have made $595m from the deal. Michael Birch has subsequently been an active investor in other startups, putting money and time into citysocializer, the Smarta startup awards and becoming a partner at PROfounders capital. He also started The Battery, a private members' club in San Francisco, as well as Monkey Inferno. Birch joins an exclusive list of executives who have returned to save their companies, including the Dell founder Michael Dell and Steve Jobs, who turned a floundering Apple into the world's most valuable company. source: the guardian
Read More

Search This Blog

search form